Thermal comfort4 out of 5Strong: comfort was solved by form first and plant second, which is the harder and more durable route.
Indoor air quality4 out of 5Strong on paper and tested at handover; the pandemic then stress-tested it in service.
Acoustic comfort3 out of 5Adequate and well-intentioned, but the least documented mandate and the most vulnerable to operational noise.
Visual comfort5 out of 5The project's clearest success and its signature — daylight and view are structural, not decorative.
Spatial comfort & function4 out of 5Strong, with an honest and deliberate trade-off between campus generosity and staff walking distance.
Building integrity4 out of 5Good: buildability was treated as a performance mandate, not just a productivity score.
Overall reading: a high degree of success against the stated goals at design and delivery level, with verification of operational performance still incomplete.